Famine is a condition of acute
scarcity of food. It can be caused due to multitudes of factors, major ones
being; crop failure, population imbalance and policy failure. Every nation in
its history has gone through phases of famine, but in Indian context, there was
a human orchestrated spike in number and toll of famines between late eighteenth
and mid twentieth century. Following is a brief summary of the role played by a
foreign colonising power in causing one of the worst human catastrophes in an erstwhile
stable civilization.
In India agriculture has
traditionally dependent upon monsoon, upon the failure of which famine like
conditions have often resulted. Other calamities like cyclones and Tsunamis have also trigerred them. These have been major historical events and
records mention 90 famines in the 2500 years of history of India. This puts the
number at roughly one famine in some part of India every 30 years. However
between 11th and 17th century there were only 14 recorded
famines averaging around one every 50 years.
Indus valley civilization is thought
to have died of one such famine erupting out of failure of monsoons for as long
as 40 years. In time there were procedures standardised and preparations made
both and individual and state level to tackle this. The oldest mention of such
efforts comes from Kautilya. At times of famines, rulers often distributed food
amongst the people and/or public works was commissioned to help the people in
need. Umaid Bhawan palace is example of one such construction.
However the frequency of such
famines increased during the British Raj. Conservative estimates put the deaths
at 60 million while it could be as high as twice that number. To put this into
perspective, an estimated 75 million people died in WW2.
Agreeing on the part played by
nature in this destruction, the biggest part in it was indeed played by the
British Government. More famines occurred in the 200 years of British rule (25)
than in all of the seven hundred years before them (14). Not to forget the scale
of these mass deaths; the largest catastrophe before British was 2 million
deaths in famine of Gujarat and Deccan famine of 1630-32, both 1772 famine of
Bengal and 1876 famine of Sothern India took over 10 million and 6 million
lives respectively.
With these numbers in mind it
looks more like a genocide perpetrated under the calls which some British made, 'of eradicating the Indian race'. While people accuse Subhash or amazingly even
Gandhi of sympathising with Hitler, these numbers suggest he was a saint
compared to the British. For many who say that British gave us so many things
and created the modern India, these tolls should make them understand
otherwise. The British treatment was severely inhumane and nothing short of
Holocaust comes close in comparison.
Let us look at the causes for
such destruction and mass deaths-
1)
British ignorance and disregard to the local
systems and conditions.
a)
Indian society had adapted to the frequent
drought conditions. The crops grown and the amount of land under each crop were
regulated by these concerns. British pushed them to grow commercial crops like
indigo and cotton. These reduced the surplus grains which were stored for lean
years making people helpless in years of low yield.
b)
The flood plains were prone to change and based
on the state of changing course of rivers, people had to be mobile to accommodate
the conditions. However this was harmful for the revenue of the Company which
wanted to have stable land records. Adding to this the road and railways
constructed embankments were forces that led to dying out of older mobile ways
of the people. This made the frequency of famines lesser but more potent.
2)
Unhinging faith in Free market Capitalism.
a)
While masses were starving, because they couldn’t
pay for the food, it was exported mainly to Britain where people had the power
to purchase. No relief works were commission in early years of British rule in
the belief that market forces should be allowed to take their course.
b)
People were forced to grow cash crops like
indigo and cotton but their prices were volatile. In the years of negative
volatility there were no provisions of support prices or aid to the farmers
which led to destitution.
3)
Apathy and low regard in part of British for
Indian masses.
a)
During the Madras famine of 1876 there was a
belief in the British administrators that the population of the locals was too
much and it needed to be controlled by famines. There was outright refusal to
provide food aids and people were left to die.
b)
India was run like a machine with main motive
being profit with utter disregard for the inhabitants. During the height of
1770 famine, the tax rates were actually raised. While normal practice in such
conditions was to forego these, the British forcefully collected the taxes,
leaving the people to die. That year the Company actually recorded an increment
in its profits.
c)
During the Famine of 1943, the main focus of
British was to preserve its Empire and despite bad harvest, past few years, the
policy of scorched earth was followed in east Bengal. There was refusal to ship
food from other stated out of fear of these getting in hands of Japanese. The
death toll at 4 million was comparable to that of Jews in Europe (6 million).
1)
Previous disastrous policies carried out by
British.
a)
The economic sanctions had broken the back of
Artisans. Indian textile industry which was more advanced than their
contemporary British ones had been reduced to rubble and most of the workers
had been absorbed back in agriculture which increased hidden unemployment and
pressure on land.
b)
Traditionally there was a tradition to forego
taxes at times of drought. But under zamindari and other land revenue systems
implemented by British were unbending and tax was collected violently.
c)
Under earlier system a part of the produce was
shared with artisans and other labourers of the village. By monetising taxes,
this was foreclosed. Most deaths during famines were these artisans and
landless labourers who couldn’t afford food.
The loss of life on such a scale was unseen before. The
modern technologies and institutions credited to British like the railroad
actually aided the effort. The grains available were moved from deep interiors
of India for export. Police and military were utilised to keep the hungry
masses from attacking the ports while these were laden.
For timeline of the same :- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_major_famines_in_India_during_British_rule
For the argument that we were not capable of governing
ourselves, the outcome if visible, but in this context it’s even more amazing. While
just four years before Independence 4 million lives were lost to famine, after
independence, it has almost lost its mighty stature. Within thirty years the
necessary investment, infrastructure and institutional changes were made and
India is today self-sufficient in food grain. This points out clearly the
unwillingness on part of British to do enough to prevent these disastrous
calamities and brings out the real motive of their presence in India; not the
white man’s burden but his insatiable greed.